決策者對技術或研究計劃會問的標準問題有那些? / 當評估研究或技術方案時有哪些是專家常問的問題? (研究生英文編修出版投稿日報) 12/4/2014

Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de La Blanca, Cardejón, España, 2012-09-01, DD 01

研究生英文編修出版投稿日報:
* 決策者對技術或研究計劃會問的標準問題有那些?
* 當評估研究或技術方案時有哪些是專家常問的問題?
* 學術英文投稿教學影片 (319) Life in Research and Academia
* Vietnam 1.2: Sử dụng thường xuyên thì chủ động (Chỉnh sửa một cách chính xác)
* 再次檢查錯誤的比較詞及粗心的疏漏 (明白寫作) 英文編修訓練 (10/ 12)
* 醫療英文論文組織寫作 (47) : (第二部分:行動)
Academic publishing news 學術英文編修出版新聞

決策者對技術或研究計劃會問的標準問題有那些?(柯泰德英文編修翻譯)

* 技術或者研究計劃清楚地表明了變革需求?

* 技術或研究計劃建立措施以針對現況問題?

* 技術或研究計劃解決結構性問題?

* 如何落實有關建議?

* 提出有效解決問題的方案?

* 方案的利是否大於弊?

Technical Writing Skills by Kim van der Linden (p. 81)

當評估研究或技術方案時有哪些是專家常問的問題?(柯泰德英文編修翻譯)

* 針對專家評估研究或技術方案而言,該研究主要的內容是否被檢查?

* 研究方法:採用哪種方法?這是最有效的方法?該方法應用得當?

* 其他條件:使用了哪些條件?在那些情況下使用?替代方案是否滿足條件?評估被正確執行了嗎?

* 後果:結論遵循邏輯?建議可行嗎?

* 條件和其他標準必須加以描述和判斷清楚,使讀者可以看到使用評價標準下的建議。

Technical Writing Skills by Kim van der Linden (p. 82)

學術英文投稿教學影片 (319) Life in Research and Academia
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力
Vietnam 1.2: Sử dụng thường xuyên thì chủ động (Chỉnh sửa một cách chính xác)( Đào tạo chỉnh sửa trong viết văn bản tiếng anh)
再次檢查錯誤的比較詞及粗心的疏漏 (明白寫作) 英文編修訓練 (10/ 12)

不合邏輯及不完整的比較詞造成更多的含糊不清,同時注意不小心漏掉的字。

請把練習題列印出來再以紅筆用標準編修註記修改:

1. A department director’s authority is more powerful than an assistant.

2. Projected expenses can be as high, if not higher than, actual ones.

3. Hsinchu has a higher concentration of technical companies than any other in Taiwan.

4. Those objectives generally conflict each other.

Answer

科技英文編修訓練手冊 柯泰德

醫療英文論文組織寫作 (47) : (第二部分:行動)

以下為醫療英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第二部分:行動)

研究目標 : 研究的目標 ?

達成目標的方法 : 你的計劃中達成目標的步驟?

希望的結果 : 你希望達成的結果?

領域的貢獻: 你的研究的貢獻?

(第二部分:行動)

研究目標 Based on the above, we should analyze causes of irreversible skin reactions and how they vary during radiation therapy by performing an iodine-starch staining test and accumulating statistics from a questionnaire survey.

達成目標的方法 To do so, two patient groups can be formed, i.e. a group of 100 patients having undergone therapeutic treatment previously and a control group of 100 patients. The reaction caused by sweat and damaged skin can then be analyzed by using the iodine-starch staining test. Next, statistical results obtained from the two groups can reveal why such a reaction occurs and varying degrees of the skin reaction.

希望的結果 As anticipated, analysis results can identify why skin reactions occur, including skin erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation and skin necrosis. Those results can provide a valuable reference for efforts to reduce skin reaction caused by irradiation by 70%.

領域的貢獻 Results of this study can shed light on why skin reactions occur during irradiation to decrease the potential harml to patients during radiation therapy by designing an appropriate treatment schedule to yield a better therapeutic outcome. In addition to decreasing the likelihood of skin reaction, e.g., carbuncular, desquamating and ulcerations, caused by irradiation treatment, this study contributes to efforts to avert hearing loss that leads to both physiological and psychological effects.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s