同行評審審核學術期刊投稿修改後再提交稿件時要強調的重點為何? / 我如何做為一個學術期刊同行審稿人? (研究生英文編修出版投稿日報) 10/8/2014

Meister der Reise des Kaisers Ming-huang nach Shu 001

研究生英文編修出版投稿日報:
* 同行評審審核學術期刊投稿修改後再提交稿件時要強調的重點為何?
* 我如何做為一個學術期刊同行審稿人? (PART A)
* 學術英文投稿教學影片 (262) How to Design a Research Poster #1
* 主詞及動詞必須前後呼應 (明白寫作) 英文編修訓練 (1/12)
* 醫療英文論文組織寫作 (33) : (第一部分:背景)
Academic publishing news 學術英文編修出版新聞

同行評審審核學術期刊投稿修改後再提交稿件時要強調的重點為何?(柯泰德英文編修翻譯)

* 為了應對最初提交的大或小的修改,作者必須寫一個回覆函,詳細說明每個審閱的顧慮問題是如何在修改稿中被解決。

* 在審查稿件的第二次,審查者必須確定作者已經解決了所有他以前顧慮的問題

* 審查者可以決定是否對作者是如何解決其他審閱人顧慮的問題作出評論。

* 除了確保作者解決了審稿人關注的問題,評論者更關心的是最終的版本是否清晰和完整。

* 如果您覺得作者在修改稿中也提出了很多被審稿人要求的改變,但它仍然是不符合期刊的標準,仍然可以拒絕修改後的稿件。

Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers
by Travis I. Lovejoy, Tracey A. Revenson, and Christopher R. France (p. 8 )

我如何做為一個學術期刊同行審稿人?(柯泰德英文編修翻譯) (PART A)

* 讓作者知道你是熱衷於評論他們的論文。當給出您的意見時,不要直接告訴作者你拒絕或接受這個論文。你應該直接告知期刊編輯。

* 你對作者的評論應是一致的。不要讚美手稿時又向期刊編輯過分批評稿件。你的建議應該符合您的意見。

* 提供詳細的解說,如果被修改後的手稿可以被刋登。如果稿件應予以拒絕就不需提供細節解說。

* 推薦修改,如果稿件將顯著貢獻某一特定領域。如果稿子不會有一個顯著貢獻則不建議修改。

* 提供支持您意見和批評的具體參考文獻。有些審稿人複製論文內容至評論,這對作者非常有幫助。

Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers
by Travis I. Lovejoy, Tracey A. Revenson, and Christopher R. France (p. 9 )

學術英文投稿教學影片 (262) How to Design a Research Poster #1: Basics of Academic Communication
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力
主詞及動詞必須前後呼應 (明白寫作) 英文編修訓練 (1/12)

如果主詞的單複數與動詞不能配合,不僅讀者感到困惑,同時句子的邏輯也會發生問題。

請把練習題列印出來再以紅筆用標準編修註記修改:

1. A number of innovative developments ( has , have ) been made in the Multi-component injection
molding process in recent years.

2. A gas channel design that ( guides , guide ) the gas flow to the desired locations ( is , are )
one of the key factors that determine a successful application.

3. The delay time along with gas injection points ( is , are ) important in producing injection-
molded parts of quality.

4. Neither the processing parameters nor the amount of polymer melt injection solely ( determine ,
determines ) a successful gas channel design.

Answer

科技英文編修訓練手冊 柯泰德

醫療英文論文組織寫作 (33) : (第一部分:背景)

以下為醫療英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第一部分:背景)

研究建構 : 你研究的主題是什麼? 你的讀者可以明瞭研究的內容嗎?

研究問題 : 你的研究裡有你試著要解決或是想更進一步瞭解的問題嗎?

研究問題的量化 : 你要如何量化問題來讓你的讀者明白之前文獻研究所遇到的量化限制?

研究問題的中心 : 如果問題沒被解決或是充分瞭解, 這對研究的讀者會有多大的負面衝擊?

(第一部分:背景) :

研究建構 While cancer ranks as the tenth leading cause of mortality, the medical field strives to detect cancer in its early stages along with appropriate therapy. Using radioactive rays is an effective means of helping physicians to diagnose whether a tumor exists, and is also used in tumor patient therapy. However, radiation poses a potential harm, necessitating the importance of controlling dosage levels during diagnostic radiology and therapy.

研究問題 The conventional radiological therapeutic cobalt-60 procedure and the traditional linear acceleator can not adequately control the radiation beam with respect to the tumor size. Some normal cells may subsequently suffer from radiation during use of the latter to eradicate abnormal cells. Additionally, a normal tissue absorbs an increasing radiactive dosage given the pervasive use of radiology treatment. Therefore, physicians and radiologists heavily emphasize the need to adequately control the dosae from a linear accelerator. Thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) is the most convenient and precise means of estimating radiation dosage. Accurate measurements obtained from TLD can be adopted to verify whether the irradiated area made by a linear accelerator is even. Additionally, using TLD to estimate radiation dosage can verify the effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy.

研究問題的量化 According to ICRP recommendations, radiology technology professionals should not be exposed to a radiation level exceeding 5 rem annually while the general public should not be exposed to more than 0.5 rem annually.

研究問題的中心 The inability to use TLD to test and veriy the irradiated area made by a linear accelerator and the dosage makes it impossible to ensure the quality of the accelerator and the reliability of the medical treatment therapy in confirming the dosage and the desired outcome.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s