作為學術期刊同行評審, 我如何寫一個審查意見報告? / 在審查提交學術期刊的手稿時我應該問什麼樣的具體問題? (研究生英文出版投稿日報) 9/14/2014

Penghu County Montage

研究生英文出版投稿日報:
*作為學術期刊同行評審, 我如何寫一個審查意見報告?(PART C)
*在審查提交學術期刊的手稿時我應該問什麼樣的具體問題?(PART E)
*學術英文投稿教學影片 (238) How To Study Like A Pro- SQ3R
*除去重複及不必要的措詞 (英文編修訓練) (精確寫作) (4 / 12)
*醫療英文論文組織寫作 (27) : (第一部分:背景)
Academic publishing news 學術英文出版新聞

在審查提交學術期刊的手稿時我應該問什麼樣的具體問題?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART E)

*是否有任何研究道德問題?

– 手稿是否有得到研究倫理委員會或機構審查委員會批准?

– 作者獲得研究參與者書面同意?

– 是否有不端行為的跡象?

* 在研究方法,數據或解釋上有任何瑕疵?

* 期刊是否應刊登手稿?

– 一些期刊希望評審提供有關是否應刊登的意見,而其他一些期刊
則只希望得到對手稿客觀的批判 。

*期刊是否尋求其他專家,如統計人員的協助,以確認數據的有效性?

How to Survive Peer Review by Elizabeth Wager, Fiona Godlee and Tom Jefferson

作為學術期刊同行評審, 我如何寫一個審查意見報告?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART C)

* 不要作出誹謗性言論。專注於手稿而不是作者。

* 要有禮貌和有建設性。

– 作者更傾向於接受批評,如果他們讀到的第一件事是肯定的。

– 識別優勢和劣勢。

* 對研究論文的疑點盡可能地有利看待。

How to Survive Peer Review by Elizabeth Wager, Fiona Godlee and Tom Jefferson

學術英文投稿教學影片 (238) How To Study Like A Pro- SQ3R
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力
除去重複及不必要的措詞 (英文編修訓練) (精確寫作) (4 / 12)

這些擾人的重複不必要的文詞其實可以完全去除或是更簡明的表達。作者若不注意這個細節則會使句子變得愈來愈長。

請把練習題列印出來再以紅筆用標準編修註記修改:

1. It is important to know the pros and cons on the occasion of choosing a compact disk (CD)
recorder.

2. There is a chance that the college will install 100Mbps cards notwithstanding the fact that
they have served the school well in the past history.

3. It could happen that the college will really keep up with the changing times on the basis of
installing 100Mbps cards.

4. To reach a conclusion on the manner in which to upgrade its system, the possibility exists for the school to replace the 10Mbps cards with the 100Mbps network cards.

Answer

科技英文編修訓練手冊 柯泰德

醫療英文論文組織寫作 (27) : (第一部分:背景)

以下為醫療英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第一部分:背景)

研究建構 : 你研究的主題是什麼? 你的讀者可以明瞭研究的內容嗎?

研究問題 : 你的研究裡有你試著要解決或是想更進一步瞭解的問題嗎?

研究問題的量化 : 你要如何量化問題來讓你的讀者明白之前文獻研究所遇到的量化限制?

研究問題的中心 : 如果問題沒被解決或是充分瞭解, 這對研究的讀者會有多大的負面衝擊?

(第一部分:背景) :

研究建構 Coronary artery angiography (CAG) can not divide the severity of left main coronary artery (LMCA) with plaque or fibrous lesion, making impossible an appropriate and immediate treatment strategy and necessitating an alternative means of determining the severity of a lesion to prescribe such a strategy. In practice, CAG displays coronary arteries by combining an x-ray intensity of 100~150 kVp and 10 mAs, making it further impossible to acquire the images of plaque and fibrous lesion with a low intensity X-ray and explaining why the severity of the lesion is often underestimated.

研究問題 For overcoming this problem, although scanning these images with intra-vessel ultrasound (IVUS) is a feasible alternative, how to define an accurate stenosis rate when calculating the cross-section area ratio is problematic.

研究問題的量化 The reference is defined as the LMCA with IVUS scanning. The clinical criteria value of a normal vessel cross-section area (CSA) is defined as the percentage confident area (Mean lumen area minus 2* standard deviation)

研究問題的中心 Although the control group can be defined as the LMCA with CAG, whether it is normal can not be determined by comparing their CSA results. Consequently, a precise treatment strategy can not be devised without comparing the criteria value and the abnormal value.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s