我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告? / 學術期刊如何回應我的手稿在我第一次投稿之後? (研究生英文出版投稿日報) 8/14/2014

Great River Queen across under KuanDu Bridge

研究生英文出版投稿日報:
*我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告?(PART F)
*學術期刊如何回應我的手稿在我第一次投稿之後?(PART E)
*學術英文投稿教學影片 (207) How to Read Citations
*動詞代替名詞 (英文編修訓練) (6 / 10 )
*醫療英文論文組織寫作 (19) : (第二部分:行動)
Academic publishing news 學術英文出版新聞

我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART F)

*明確標示您的每一個意見來源。

-明確標示您的意見無論是作為反映自己的意見或對支持的數據而言。

*決定是否簽署審查

– 無論同行評審是開放的或匿名的,似乎在同行評審的質量上及他們所花費的時間,以及關於對提交稿件的長處和局限性建議上幾乎沒有區別。

*在期刊給出的期限內發送您的意見。

How to peer review a manuscript by Moher D and Jadad AR. (p. 186)

學術期刊如何回應我的手稿在我第一次投稿之後?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART E)

*本學術期刊拒絕您所提交的稿件且沒有機會重新提交。

-可能是由於稿子不適合這個期刊,或者因為你的研究是用不可靠的方法途徑。

– 有時候,期刊編輯硬是沒找到你文章有趣,新穎的或足夠重要的內容以供出版。

– 特別是如果你等了很長的時間來獲得您所提交的稿件被否定的回答。

– 如果你覺得審查的意見是不公平或錯誤,你可以寫信給編輯對決定提出上訴,並要求新的審查。但是,這很少成功。

– 另一種選擇是重新提交您的稿件另一個期刊。如果你這樣做,一定要客觀地評價之前期刊審查拒絕你論文的意見,以便你可以從中學習。

How to reply to peer review comments when submitting papers for publicationby HC Williams

學術英文投稿教學影片 (207) How to Read Citations
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力
動詞代替名詞 (英文編修訓練) (6 / 10 )

句子冗贅的原因也可能是使用太多的名詞,通常這些名詞是由動詞轉化來的,而結果是使動詞更無力,此部份會在第四單元詳論。此外,過份的濫用名詞也帶來了多餘的介係詞。

請把練習題列印出來再以紅筆用標準編修註記修改:

11. Only those factors having significant effects on the response average are identified by the
proposed procedure so that unreplicated experiments can be interpreted

12. Selection is made of the optimal levels by experienced engineers for the factors having
significant effects on the response average and standard deviation.

13. A serious limitation on the effectiveness of the current system are caused by user demand.

14. Creation of new genes is possible by innovative technologists

15. The requirement that ID cards must be shown by students when entering the library is
stipulated by school policy.

Answer

科技英文編修訓練手冊 柯泰德

醫療英文論文組織寫作 (19) : (第二部分:行動)

以下為醫療英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第二部分:行動)

研究目標 : 研究的目標 ?

達成目標的方法 : 你的計劃中達成目標的步驟?

希望的結果 : 你希望達成的結果?

領域的貢獻: 你的研究的貢獻?

(第二部分:行動)

研究目標 Based on the above, we should analyze causes of irreversible skin reactions and how they vary during radiation therapy by performing an iodine-starch staining test and accumulating statistics from a questionnaire survey.

達成目標的方法 To do so, two patient groups can be formed, i.e. a group of 100 patients having undergone therapeutic treatment previously and a control group of 100 patients. The reaction caused by sweat and damaged skin can then be analyzed by using the iodine-starch staining test. Next, statistical results obtained from the two groups can reveal why such a reaction occurs and varying degrees of the skin reaction.

希望的結果 As anticipated, analysis results can identify why skin reactions occur, including skin erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation and skin necrosis. Those results can provide a valuable reference for efforts to reduce skin reaction caused by irradiation by 70%.

領域的貢獻 Results of this study can shed light on why skin reactions occur during irradiation to decrease the potential harml to patients during radiation therapy by designing an appropriate treatment schedule to yield a better therapeutic outcome. In addition to decreasing the likelihood of skin reaction, e.g., carbuncular, desquamating and ulcerations, caused by irradiation treatment, this study contributes to efforts to avert hearing loss that leads to both physiological and psychological effects.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s