學術期刊如何回應我的手稿在我第一次投稿之後? / 我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告? (研究生英文出版投稿日報) 8/13/2014

Wuling in Taiwan

研究生英文出版投稿日報:
*學術期刊如何回應我的手稿在我第一次投稿之後?(PART D)
*我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告?(PART E)
*學術英文投稿教學影片 (206) Peer Review in 3 Minutes
*動詞代替名詞 (英文編修訓練) (5 / 10 )
*醫療英文論文組織寫作 (19) : (第一部分:背景)
Academic publishing news 學術英文出版新聞

學術期刊如何回應我的手稿在我第一次投稿之後?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART D)

*本學術期刊並沒有明確說明是否你的稿件是否被拒絕,或者是否應該重新提交稿件。

– 一個例子是,當期刊編輯說:“We cannot accept your paper in its current form, but if you do decide to resubmit, then we would only consider a substantial revision。”雖然這聽起來像一個拒絕,這則評論可能表示有機會重新提交。

– 如果你不確定回覆的意思,請教有經驗的同事或者是在那期刊擔任審查者。

– 或者,乾脆寫信回給編輯要求澄清。

*本學術期刊拒絕您所提交的稿件且沒有機會重新提交。

How to reply to peer review comments when submitting papers for publication by HC Williams

我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART E)

* 確認在審查過程中獲得的任何幫助

– 無論你完成了同行評審單獨或是有別人幫助都要加以說明。

– 列出任何幫助同行評議貢獻的人名。

* 作出評論時不要超出你的專業知識。

– 請確保您了解期刊編輯所要的意見類型 ,你不需要覆蓋所有可能的各個方面。

How to peer review a manuscript by Moher D and Jadad AR. (p. 186)

學術英文投稿教學影片 (206) Peer Review in 3 Minutes
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力
動詞代替名詞 (英文編修訓練) (5 / 10 )

句子冗贅的原因也可能是使用太多的名詞,通常這些名詞是由動詞轉化來的,而結果是使動詞更無力,此部份會在第四單元詳論。此外,過份的濫用名詞也帶來了多餘的介係詞。

請把練習題列印出來再以紅筆用標準編修註記修改:

6. Identification and assessment of several models is possible.

7. Promulgation and verification of the accreditation standards is impossible.

8. This cycle is continued with until fluctuation of the selected model stops.

9. An evaluation of their adequacy can be made with the proposed scheme.

10. Reduction of the task complexity is achieved by application of the nonparametric technique to industrial settings.

Answer

科技英文編修訓練手冊 柯泰德

醫療英文論文組織寫作 (19) : (第一部分:背景)

以下為醫療英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第一部分:背景)

研究建構 : 你研究的主題是什麼? 你的讀者可以明瞭研究的內容嗎?

研究問題 : 你的研究裡有你試著要解決或是想更進一步瞭解的問題嗎?

研究問題的量化 : 你要如何量化問題來讓你的讀者明白之前文獻研究所遇到的量化限制?

研究問題的中心 : 如果問題沒被解決或是充分瞭解, 這對研究的讀者會有多大的負面衝擊?

(第一部分:背景) :

研究建構 Although advances in medical technology and therapeutic treatment have greatly increased the survival rate of patients diagnosed with nasal and pharyngeal cancer, patients receiving irradiation treatment experience adverse side effects, including skin reaction, bone necrosis and hearing loss. Such irreversible reactions lower their quality of living, accounting for the search for alternative methods to decrease patient discomfort accompanied with radiation therapy.

研究問題 Given the increasing number of patients receiving radiation therapy, which is less discomforting than chemotherapy or surgery, adverse side effects of treating patient’s diagnosed with nasal and pharyngeal cancer must be resolved. As is generally assumed, skin reaction caused by treatment is irreversible because the radial destroys the dermal cell and the hearing cell, explaining for the search of an effective means of averting side effects irradiation treatments or patients of nasal and pharyngeal cancer.

研究問題的量化 For instance, the side effect of the skin reaction is generally assumed to be irreversible because the radial destroys the dermal cell and the hearing cell, necessitating the development of a method that can avoid the side effects incurred by irradiation for the patient of N.P.C.

研究問題的中心 The inability to eliminate the adverse side effects of irradiation treatment makes it impossible to improve the therapeutic outcome. Patient discomfort may cause them to stop therapy or not adhere to the therapeutic schedule, explaining the urgency to remedy this problem. Moreover, the ability to provide better care for the patient would not only decrease the adverse side effects brought on by irradiation treatment, but also increase the curative rate.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s