學術期刊進行同行評議的實用技巧有那些? / 我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告? (研究生英文出版投稿日報) 8/9/2014

Timeless @ Hualien, Taiwan (3997615838)

研究生英文出版投稿日報:
*學術期刊進行同行評議的實用技巧有那些?(PART B)
*我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告?(PART A)
*學術英文投稿教學影片 (202) Library catalogs
*動詞代替名詞 (英文編修訓練) ( 1/ 10)
*醫療英文論文組織寫作 (18) : (第一部分:背景)
Academic publishing news 學術英文出版新聞

學術期刊進行同行評議的實用技巧有那些?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART B)

*問問自己,你是否有足夠的時間以確保滿足截止日期

– 據估計,一個新手審稿平均要8-12小時審查時間,並對該期刊報告。

*請記住,你唯一的信息來源是你從期刊中收到的報告。

*遵循一個系統過程,檢討手稿。

– 在審查提交的稿件,你應該專注問題重要性 ,研究問題的獨創性,它的長處和劣勢(內容,方法,道德),演示文稿清晰度,對結果的解釋,未來的發展方向,以及是否適合出版。

How to peer review a manuscript by Moher D and Jadad AR. (p. 184)

我如何為學術期刊寫一個有效的同儕審查報告?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART A)

*按照期刊的指示

– 大多數的期刊會包括一個頁面要你對編輯寫一般和具體意見和一個或多個頁面描述註釋給作者的意見。

-按手稿的部分列出您的寶貴意見。

-頁面,段落和行註釋。

– 請確保您使用清晰,易於理解的語言,以及實例闡明要點。

How to peer review a manuscript by Moher D and Jadad AR. (p. 186)

學術英文投稿教學影片 (202) Library catalogs
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力
動詞代替名詞 (英文編修訓練) ( 1/ 10)

句子冗贅的原因也可能是使用太多的名詞,通常這些名詞是由動詞轉化來的,而結果是使動詞更無力,此部份會在第四單元詳論。此外,過份的濫用名詞也帶來了多餘的介係詞。

請把練習題列印出來再以紅筆用標準編修註記修改:

1. Difficulty is encountered in explanation of the method to inexperienced engineers owing to its computational complexity.

2. Simulation of the program is performed in this study.

3. A slight increase occurs in the deposition rate.

4. Knowledge of how the variables are distributed is not re- quired by novice engineers

5. Not only is the variability of the control factors considered by the proposed procedure, but implementation of related tasks is performed by that same procedure.

Answer

科技英文編修訓練手冊 柯泰德

醫療英文論文組織寫作 (18) : (第一部分:背景)

以下為醫療英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第一部分:背景)

研究建構 : 你研究的主題是什麼? 你的讀者可以明瞭研究的內容嗎?

研究問題 : 你的研究裡有你試著要解決或是想更進一步瞭解的問題嗎?

研究問題的量化 : 你要如何量化問題來讓你的讀者明白之前文獻研究所遇到的量化限制?

研究問題的中心 : 如果問題沒被解決或是充分瞭解, 這對研究的讀者會有多大的負面衝擊?

(第一部分:背景) :

研究建構 Ranking eighth among all cancers in Taiwan and first among children, leukemia is on the rise. In vivo detection of leukemia in children can be determined using hydrogen 1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).

研究問題 Although capable of differentiating between red bone marrow and yellow bone marrow, the MRS signal for the bone marrow only has two peaks: a red bone marrow-like water signal at 4.6~4.8ppm and a yellow bone marrow-like fat signal at 1.1~1.3ppm. Examinations performed at 1.5T magnetic do not yield a clear MRS signal, explaining why in vivo detection of bone marrow in qualitative and quantitative analyses is extremely difficult.

研究問題的量化 Earlier investigations on bone marrow biochemical analysis adopted the biopsy technique. Given advances in medical modalities in recent years, characterization of MRS is not invasive and surveys continue in different echo times. Further investigation could help differentiate between the percentage of normal and abnormal bone marrow of Leukemia.

研究問題的中心 The inability to analyze the MRS signal for the bone marrow of leukemia makes it impossible to develop a method that is not invasis and more effective than conventional therapeutic follow up methods. Therefore, a photon MRS in vivo method must be developed, capable of assessing the bone marrow of leukemia to supersede conventional examinations.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s