我是否有資格作為一個學術同行評議的審查人? / 作為學術期刊同行評議的評審提交意見應注意事項?: (研究生英文出版投稿日報) 8/7/2014

Villager pushing his bicycle at Hualien. "Lets Bike Taiwan 2009" (3982542088)

研究生英文出版投稿日報:
*我是否有資格作為一個學術同行評議的審查人?
*作為學術期刊同行評議的評審提交意見應注意事項? (PART B)
*學術英文投稿教學影片 (200) Making an academic research poster using Power Point
*常用主動語氣 (精確英文寫作) (英文編修訓練) (11/12)
*科學英文論文組織寫作 (18) : (第一部分:背景)
Academic publishing news 學術英文出版新聞

我是否有資格作為一個學術同行評議的審查人?(柯泰德翻譯)

*我的專業領域資格足夠我徹底評估手稿?

– 我的專業知識是期刊編輯正在尋找需要的?

*我可以提供這方面工作的公平評論?

– 在審查期間,我可以做到不偏不倚 ?

*我可以客觀評價稿件?

– 我是否可以審查這項工作而沒有對於作者有任何個人偏見或成見

*我是否有時間?

– 在不犧牲質量下, 我是否可以完成同行評議使新的發現能盡快公佈?

A Quick Guide to Writing a Solid Peer Review by Nicholas, KA and Gordon, WS.

作為學術期刊同行評議的評審提交意見應注意事項?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART B)

*審稿應明確自己的批評,並提供證據以適當的引用來證明他們的批評。

*審稿人應該記住它是作者的論文,而不是試圖將其改寫成自己喜歡的風格。然而,對於提高清晰度的建議是重要的。

*審稿人應該知道作者對語言問題的敏感性。反饋要適當體貼。

*審稿人應明確指出哪些額外的步驟是必不可少的以支持手稿的論點。

*審稿人不應表明審查應由另外一個人完成。

Guidelines for Peer Reviewers by Irene Hames

學術英文投稿教學影片 (200) Making an academic research poster using Power Point
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力
常用主動語氣 (精確英文寫作) (英文編修訓練) (11/12)

就像先前所說,如何用最少的字來表達一個完整的意念通常是科技寫作者一個大挑戰,然而這裡有一個祕訣,那就是使用主動語法。請記住主動語氣使句子更直接,明確及更有說服力。

請把練習題列印出來再以紅筆用標準編修註記修改:

6. Necessary trade-offs should be made to choose suitable adjustment factors.

7. The task in which the optimal adjustment factors are determined becomes more complicated when multiple characteristics exist.

8. That an adjustment factor must be found is of heavy emphasis in the conventional scheme.

9. There is only a slight effect on MRSN by Factor D, but a significant effect on the average of DT-response.

10. Six controllable factors were identified in their study.

11. Improvement in thickness uniformity is made with the optimization procedure proposed herein.

12. Computation of the quality loss, determination of the multi-response signal to noise ratio, and verification of the experimental results are achieved by the procedure.

Answer

科技英文編修訓練手冊 柯泰德

科學英文論文組織寫作 (18) : (第一部分:背景)

以下為科學英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第一部分:背景)

研究建構 : 你研究的主題是什麼? 你的讀者可以明瞭研究的內容嗎?

研究問題 : 你的研究裡有你試著要解決或是想更進一步瞭解的問題嗎?

研究問題的量化 : 你要如何量化問題來讓你的讀者明白之前文獻研究所遇到的量化限制?

研究問題的中心 : 如果問題沒被解決或是充分瞭解, 這對研究的讀者會有多大的負面衝擊?

(第一部分:背景) :

研究建構 Given that amylases that produce maltotriose as the major end product from raw starch granules are relatively rare, efforts have been underway to optimize the cultivation conditions for producing this extracellular amylase by Thermobifida fusca NTU22.

研究問題 This newly isolated strain is of relevant interest because the strain produces an extracellular amylase that releases maltotriose as the major end product from either soluble starch or raw starch granules.

研究問題的量化 The commercial produced form in bulk from microorganisms represents about 25–33% of the global enzyme market. Most _-amylases (EC 3.2.1.1, 1,4-_-d-glucan glucanohydrolyase) produce glucose or maltose as the major product from starch. Production of this extracellular amylase by maltotriose-producing α-amylase from Thermobifida fusca NTU22 can replace thermophilic microorganisms.

研究問題的中心 The inability to produce this extracellular amylase by maltotriose-producingα-amylase from Thermobifida fusca NTU22 as a replacement for thermophilic microorganisms makes it impossible to solve lost moisture and retrogradation of starch in foodstuffs.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s