作為學術期刊同行評議的評審在審查學術期刊稿件時應注意事項? / 作為一個學術期刊同行評議的評審應注意事項? (研究生英文出版投稿日報) 8/5/2014

Taiwan Rendezvous at Hualien (3978988709)

研究生英文出版投稿日報:
*作為學術期刊同行評議的評審在審查學術期刊稿件時應注意事項?(PART D)
*作為一個學術期刊同行評議的評審應注意事項? (PART D)
*學術英文投稿教學影片 (198) How to Identify Scholarly Journal Articles
*常用主動語氣 (精確英文寫作) (英文編修訓練) (9/12)
*醫療英文論文組織寫作 (17) : (第一部分:背景)
Academic publishing news 學術英文出版新聞

作為學術期刊同行評議的評審在審查學術期刊稿件時應注意事項?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART D)

*審稿人應立即通知當期刊

-在研究或寫作提交手稿時不當行為的發生

*審稿人應該保密,且沒有因個人因素深入研究手稿,除非該期刊要求進一步的信息或建議。

*審稿人不應該故意延長審查過程中,無論是通過延遲提交其審查或從期刊或作者要求不必要的附加信息。

*審稿人應確保他們的檢討是根據作品的優劣,而不是由任何個人,財務或其他衝突的考慮或受智慧偏見的影響。

*審稿人應該不要直接與作者聯繫如沒有期刊的許可。

Guidelines for Peer Reviewers by Irene Hames

作為一個學術期刊同行評議的評審應注意事項?(柯泰德翻譯) (PART D)

*審稿人不應該同意審閱手稿只是為了獲得它的內容但無意提出審查意見。

*審稿人應拒絕審閱手稿,如果他們覺得無法提供一個公平和公正的審查。

*審稿人應拒絕審閱手稿,如果他們已經參與手稿中的任何工作或和其有關的任何報導。

*審稿人應拒絕審閱手稿,如果該手稿和他們在其它期刊準備或正在審稿的其他論文內容相似。

*審稿人應拒絕審閱手稿,如果他們無法同意該期刊的同行評審標準。

Guidelines for Peer Reviewers by Irene Hames

學術英文投稿教學影片 (198) How to Identify Scholarly Journal Articles
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力
常用主動語氣 (精確英文寫作) (英文編修訓練) (9/12)

就像先前所說,如何用最少的字來表達一個完整的意念通常是科技寫作者一個大挑戰,然而這裡有一個祕訣,那就是使用主動語法。請記住主動語氣使句子更直接,明確及更有說服力。

請把練習題列印出來再以紅筆用標準編修註記修改:

6. The complexity of the computational process is increased in the presence of the conventional method.

7. The equation is difficult to explain by Taguchi’s quality loss.

8. A safety valve is contained in the machine for when cautionary measures must be taken by the inspector.

9. Evaluation of the course materials must be made by the class leader.

10. Design of the system by the engineer is allowed by the department manager.

Answer

科技英文編修訓練手冊 柯泰德

醫療英文論文組織寫作 (17) : (第一部分:背景)

以下為醫療英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第一部分:背景)

研究建構 : 你研究的主題是什麼? 你的讀者可以明瞭研究的內容嗎?

研究問題 : 你的研究裡有你試著要解決或是想更進一步瞭解的問題嗎?

研究問題的量化 : 你要如何量化問題來讓你的讀者明白之前文獻研究所遇到的量化限制?

研究問題的中心 : 如果問題沒被解決或是充分瞭解, 這對研究的讀者會有多大的負面衝擊?

(第一部分:背景) :

研究建構 Rapid advances in magnetic resonance technology have led to the extensive use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as a non-invasive diagnostic method for evaluating the biliary tree and pancreatic duct.

研究問題 Some invasive techniques, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), use either an endoscope or a guided wire inside the patient’s body to obtain an image of the digestive system image, often creating patient discomfort and possibly leading to infection.

研究問題的量化 For instance, the conventional procedure utilizes an invasive approach in which the procedure lasts an average of nearly 40 minutes, longer than a patient can tolerate. Despite the long procedure time, the incidence rate of infection of MRCP is 0%, obviously, better than the conventional procedure.

研究問題的中心 However, MRI instrumentation has its limitations. Patients with a pacemaker or implanted ferromagnetic metal should avoid MRCP scanning. Additionally, a stone may be misdiagnosed as another type of intraluminal filling defect, such as an intraductal tumor, blood clot, or gas bubble. Moreover, ascites or ileus may occasionally hinder the diagnosis of the extrahepatic biliary ducts and gall bladder lesions.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s