什麼是審稿人評估提交手稿共同的標準? / 什麼是學術期刊典型的同行評審過程?: 研究生英文出版投稿日報 7/16/2014

研究生英文出版投稿日報:

*什麼是審稿人評估提交手稿共同的標準? (PART B)

*什麼是學術期刊典型的同行評審過程? (PART B)

*學術英文投稿教學影片 (178) How to Publish in a Top Journal (5/11)

*明白寫作 (英文編修訓練)

*醫療英文論文組織寫作 (12) : (第一部分:背景)

Academic publishing news 學術英文出版新聞

什麼是審稿人評估提交手稿共同的標準? (PART B) (柯泰德翻譯)

*證據:方法的數據和分析可靠和值得信賴?

– 對統計設計和分析是否合適?

– 是否有足夠的數據支持結論?

*推理:邏輯,論據,推論和解釋值得信賴?

– 是否有抗辯或相反的證據來加以考慮?

Peer Review and the Acceptance of New Scientific Ideas by Tracey Brown (2.7)

什麼是學術期刊典型的同行評審過程? (PART B) (柯泰德翻譯)

*對於一些期刊,評議由期刊全職評審人員進行。對於其他期刊,可能由外找的專業研究人員完成。

*審稿人評價因素,包括:

– 研究的設計和方法是否適當

– 數據是否可信

– 提交的文稿是否清楚

Peer Review and the Acceptance of New Scientific Ideas by Tracey Brown (2.1-2.4)

學術英文投稿教學影片 (178) How to Publish in a Top Journal (5/11)
觀看本學術英文投稿教學影片以加強英文寫作投稿能力

明白寫作 (英文編修訓練)
科技英文寫作者常常寫非所想,當然誤導了讀者,此時明白寫作就很重要,除了要把文章寫得精確以外,更要使讀者不誤解您的意思

科技英文編修訓練手冊(進階篇) 柯泰德

醫療英文論文組織寫作 (12) : (第一部分:背景)

以下為醫療英文研究的基本科技論點:

(第一部分:背景)

研究建構 : 你研究的主題是什麼? 你的讀者可以明瞭研究的內容嗎?

研究問題 : 你的研究裡有你試著要解決或是想更進一步瞭解的問題嗎?

研究問題的量化 : 你要如何量化問題來讓你的讀者明白之前文獻研究所遇到的量化限制?

研究問題的中心 : 如果問題沒被解決或是充分瞭解, 這對研究的讀者會有多大的負面衝擊?

(第一部分:背景) :

研究建構 Computer tomography (CT) plays a prominent role in diagnosing medical ailments owing to its ability to achieve precise treatment without unnecessarily high radiation levels that would harm patients. Restated, while effective in therapeutic treatment, CT can not be used during a routine examination. Efforts to integrate CT into routine examinations is thus of priority concern.

研究問題 Although medical images are normally taken through conventional x-ray procedures, such procedures are limited in that while confined to capturing three-dimensional objects, many organs overlap each other, making it impossible to distinguish between them. Conversely, CT can not only detect diseases in their early stages, but also more effectively treat diseases. Nevertheless, CT is not adopted in routine examinations owing to its higher radiation dose than in normal examinations. Conventional medical imagery procedures emit a low radiation dose owing to the limited exposure time.

研究問題的量化 For instance, a normal chest x-ray examination, a radiation dosage of only 0.5mGy poses a relatively low risk to the human body. However, a CT examination may contain ten to twenty times higher dosage levels than a conventional x-ray examination would owing to the longer exposure time, possibly causing human injury.

研究問題的中心 Despite the advantages of CT images over those of conventional x-ray images, the inability to reduce its radiation dose to a safe level makes it impossible to detect and subsequently treat cancer in its early stages. The feasibility of accelerating the scanning time during a CT examination must be examined, thus reducing radiation dose levels.

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

Source: 有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

密集課程 (柯泰德): Organizing Technical Research Papers(科技研究論文組織寫作)

密集課程 (柯泰德):Developing Copyediting Skills(英文編修訓練)

有效撰寫英文工作提案 柯泰德

3 responses to “什麼是審稿人評估提交手稿共同的標準? / 什麼是學術期刊典型的同行評審過程?: 研究生英文出版投稿日報 7/16/2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s